This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
afcd [2024/03/15 20:13] – afcd | afcd [2024/04/11 10:41] (current) – afcd | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
The experience I have gained as an expert and convenor of various standardisation committees has enabled me to understand and highlight the problems associated with the specific nature (and complexity) of the whole standardisation process. This has enabled me to study the extent to which approaches based on knowledge engineering can be used in the drafting of standards, in particular the development of ontologies corresponding to the knowledge domains of the technical standards to be taken into account, but also the consideration of interoperability issues. As ontologies can differ in scope, point of view and granularity, | The experience I have gained as an expert and convenor of various standardisation committees has enabled me to understand and highlight the problems associated with the specific nature (and complexity) of the whole standardisation process. This has enabled me to study the extent to which approaches based on knowledge engineering can be used in the drafting of standards, in particular the development of ontologies corresponding to the knowledge domains of the technical standards to be taken into account, but also the consideration of interoperability issues. As ontologies can differ in scope, point of view and granularity, | ||
+ | |||
+ | The concept of digital twin is an important part of my research work, particularly through the modelling and representation of the information exchanges that it enables between the players involved throughout the various stages of industrial processes. Standardisation plays a very important role here, as the interoperability of these exchanges will be facilitated by the use of standardised languages and approaches. | ||
Other applications in my research area include :\\ | Other applications in my research area include :\\ |