Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
afcd [2024/03/15 18:49] afcdafcd [2024/04/11 10:41] (current) afcd
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 ** Formation :**\\ ** Formation :**\\
-ENS Cachan, Agrégation de Génie Civil\\ +Ecole Normale Supérieure de Cachan, Agrégation de Génie Civil\\ 
-- Doctorat, HDR (section CNU 61) (Université de Savoie-Mont-Blanc, Chambéry)\\+- Doctorat, HDR (section CNU 61) (Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Chambéry)\\
  
 ---- ----
  
  
-**2007-2018** : +**2000-2018** : 
 Professeur des Universités\\ Professeur des Universités\\
-Ecole Centrale de Lille,+- IUT d'Evry Val d'Essonne, Département QLIO, 91000 Evry\\ 
 +Ecole Centrale de Lille,
 Cité Scientifique, CS 20048, 59651 VILLENEUVE D'ASCQ CEDEX, F\\ Cité Scientifique, CS 20048, 59651 VILLENEUVE D'ASCQ CEDEX, F\\
 **2018- ** : **2018- ** :
Line 66: Line 67:
  
 The experience I have gained as an expert and convenor of various standardisation committees has enabled me to understand and highlight the problems associated with the specific nature (and complexity) of the whole standardisation process. This has enabled me to study the extent to which approaches based on knowledge engineering can be used in the drafting of standards, in particular the development of ontologies corresponding to the knowledge domains of the technical standards to be taken into account, but also the consideration of interoperability issues. As ontologies can differ in scope, point of view and granularity, it is often necessary to use alignment techniques to enable the different models to be synthesised.  The experience I have gained as an expert and convenor of various standardisation committees has enabled me to understand and highlight the problems associated with the specific nature (and complexity) of the whole standardisation process. This has enabled me to study the extent to which approaches based on knowledge engineering can be used in the drafting of standards, in particular the development of ontologies corresponding to the knowledge domains of the technical standards to be taken into account, but also the consideration of interoperability issues. As ontologies can differ in scope, point of view and granularity, it is often necessary to use alignment techniques to enable the different models to be synthesised. 
 +
 +The concept of digital twin is an important part of my research work, particularly through the modelling and representation of the information exchanges that it enables between the players involved throughout the various stages of industrial processes. Standardisation plays a very important role here, as the interoperability of these exchanges will be facilitated by the use of standardised languages and approaches.
  
 Other applications in my research area include :\\ Other applications in my research area include :\\