This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| afcd [2024/03/15 10:38] – afcd | afcd [2024/04/11 10:41] (current) – afcd | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| **(http:// | **(http:// | ||
| - | **Web of Science | + | ---- |
| + | |||
| + | ** Formation | ||
| + | - Ecole Normale Supérieure de Cachan, Agrégation de Génie Civil\\ | ||
| + | - Doctorat, HDR (section CNU 61) (Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Chambéry)\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| - | **2007-2018** : | + | **2000-2018** : |
| - | Ecole Centrale de Lille, | + | Professeur des Universités\\ |
| + | - IUT d'Evry Val d' | ||
| + | - Ecole Centrale de Lille, | ||
| Cité Scientifique, | Cité Scientifique, | ||
| **2018- ** : | **2018- ** : | ||
| Line 59: | Line 67: | ||
| The experience I have gained as an expert and convenor of various standardisation committees has enabled me to understand and highlight the problems associated with the specific nature (and complexity) of the whole standardisation process. This has enabled me to study the extent to which approaches based on knowledge engineering can be used in the drafting of standards, in particular the development of ontologies corresponding to the knowledge domains of the technical standards to be taken into account, but also the consideration of interoperability issues. As ontologies can differ in scope, point of view and granularity, | The experience I have gained as an expert and convenor of various standardisation committees has enabled me to understand and highlight the problems associated with the specific nature (and complexity) of the whole standardisation process. This has enabled me to study the extent to which approaches based on knowledge engineering can be used in the drafting of standards, in particular the development of ontologies corresponding to the knowledge domains of the technical standards to be taken into account, but also the consideration of interoperability issues. As ontologies can differ in scope, point of view and granularity, | ||
| + | |||
| + | The concept of digital twin is an important part of my research work, particularly through the modelling and representation of the information exchanges that it enables between the players involved throughout the various stages of industrial processes. Standardisation plays a very important role here, as the interoperability of these exchanges will be facilitated by the use of standardised languages and approaches. | ||
| Other applications in my research area include :\\ | Other applications in my research area include :\\ | ||
| Line 65: | Line 75: | ||
| - semantic integration, | - semantic integration, | ||
| - semantic interoperability, | - semantic interoperability, | ||
| - | - semantic frameworks and their application to the representation of information and knowledge linked to standardisation and norms (standards roadmaps). | + | - semantic frameworks and their application to the representation of information and knowledge linked to standardisation and norms (standards roadmaps),\\ |
| + | - digital twins.\\ | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| Line 118: | Line 129: | ||
| *** European level (CEN) :**\\ | *** European level (CEN) :**\\ | ||
| - | - CEN TC 310 (Advanced automation technologies and their applications) European technical committee [[http:// | + | - CEN TC 310 (Advanced automation technologies and their applications) European technical committee [[https:// |
| Line 130: | Line 141: | ||
| - ISO-IEC-ITU-UN/ | - ISO-IEC-ITU-UN/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||